Advertising .. deeeception .. ahoy

"There are those Super Geeks that can do the impossible; but, they certainly aren't selling their list for such a small fee, if they sell it at all. These lists are considered GOLD and many are highly targeted with the potential for extremely huge earnings."


how can anyone fall for it .. but they do .. these 'extremely huge earnings' .. warning .. seeped so deep into their being .. sterilises their brains .. renders them unable to think and act .. beyond it

falling victims .. to deeeeception ..ahoy ..

how can anyone fall for it .. but they do .. these 'extremely huge earnings' .. warning .. seeped so deep into their being .. sterilises their brains .. renders them unable to think and act .. beyond it

falling victims .. to deeeeception ..ahoy ..

Advertising Sabotage
The Dirty SECRET Ways Admins Kill Your Ads

the website that brings it out .. are not any better .. civil warfare .. killing each other out .. whoever survives ..will enjoy .. huuuuge earnings .. on the backs of their clients ..

Roads of Britain safe .. rejoice .. hoards of pompous rote-learning traffic police know-alls .. see to that.

roads of Britain safe .. rejoice .. hoards of pompous rote-learning traffic police know-alls .. see to that

.. eunuchising .. cutting-the-balls off .. of criminally insane drivers .. Cameron's gifts

traffic police agents .. licensed to numb minds .. mush brains their powers unlimited

drivers .. how do they dare ignore .. the modicums of safety .. endangering themselves, their lives seeping through in reckless driving

drivers .. totally incapable ... unable to think .. to fend for themselves

traffic police works hard to that .. to drum it into their dull minds .. to remind them .. their safety ..is paramount .. what so .. criminally neglect .. to pay attention to .. it is a miracle they are still alive ..

drivers .. their incompetence .. their lack of common sense .. has to be made evident

drivers .. people .. their brains mushed .. confused .. left in disarray .. they are .....ready

Cameron hard in his task ..assault them in any way he can .. to pave the way .. for the real gifts to come

cuts in budgets .. services curtailed .. losses of jobs ..name it ...

Cunning Cameron's Big Society idea.

BBC News - Big Society is my mission, says David Cameron

Cunning Mr Cameron .. cuts in services .. to create the vacuum .. building up the big society .. flood it with volunteers .. to fill it ..

.. young and naive Mr Milliband .. Cameron's cuts undermining .. his big society society idea ...

Cameron's cuts .. promotes it .. paves the way .. more likely ...

.. charities as well .. for spending cuts .. well, voluntary means without pay .. live with idea .. charities .. social entrepreneurs .. getting paid well ... to do the charity work ..

there is no money to spare .. in Cameron's Big Society .. there is hardly enough .. for the HIGH Society .. to get by ..

and the other thing Cameron said .. responsible citizens .. how does Mr Cameron promotes responsibility? .. by law and order? .. imported zero tolerance ideas .. the enforcers strengthened since he came by .. their long arms reach everywhere .. and especially the masses, the so-called law-abiding citizens .. that they don't need their arms poking into their every day affairs ..

total eclipse of their minds .. the long arms have ready made solutions for every problem and puzzle they come up against .. everything .. they don't have to think .. they have others to think for them .. the knowing-all enforcers .. how can the masses learn responsibility .. if they are not left and, many times not allowed, to think for themselves .. will Mr Cameron bless them .. with responsibility?

let me promote an idea of what Cameron's Big Society will actually be .. states of citizens and not states of corporations

Religion and the people's revolt in North Africa

In "Brazil's 'lessons' for Arab rebels" in Al Jazzeera
"Countries transitioning to democracy need to reduce economic inequality, says Brazil's former foreign minister."

The struggle to eradicate inequality.


"I'd imagine that religious institutions will play a pretty prominent role in [any transition] in the Middle East," Flynn said"

.. the correlation undignified .. suppressive regimes .. religion .. hand-in-hand .. and there is not any need .. to invoke Iran .. to support this conjecture

and if not always .. but when not .. only thanks to solitary clerics .. and certainly not .. of religion itself .. of any religion ..

and certainly .. that makes the exception .. but never the rule .. they act(ed) as being part of the people .. and as people among other people .. together ..walk to their foreseen destination .. eradicate inequality ..

the people's will paramount .. and not subject .. to religion what's-o-ever ... religion .. if it may, a follower of the people .. and not the people followers of religion ..

if Brazil is a step .. what people in Egypt,Tunisia are on the way .. is ten steps ahead ..

if Brazil having a leftist guerilla .. as president .. it is not by itself .. proof .. that people's will is paramount .. what's the difference of .. ' leaving abject poverty for less grinding poverty' .. if Brazil believes that their goal is .. to make all Brazilians .. middle-class .. they lost the game from its beginning ..

do not ever confuse .. what happens in Latin America .. with what happens in the Arab world ..

you will reach to the wrong conclusions .. by relying upon wrongly interpreted achievements .. you will find yourselves lacking .. when the situations demand to prove .. what societies .. have 'learned' ..


al Jazzeera's unwillingness to display comments .. a smear to their reputation .. filtering out .. to what .. for whatever reason .. find distasteful

they are not .. as open-minded .. as they make the public assume ..

they are afraid themselves

Ongoing debate small vs big government. Small government? No government at all. The state would have nothing to do with you. Eat your hearts out.

The state is, of people. Your hands off.



small government? ..no government at all .. eat your hearts out, amongst you, to your utter delight .. government would have nothing to do with you .. and you can get all the politicians to your boosom ... to actually find their purpose in life .. what they longed-for .. even before they made the decision to enter politics ..

governments will be manned by people, the men and women that make up, create societies, not from the current bunch that work solely for your corporations, your banks ..

the governments organised

will assume control of all the products and services that people need

.. to buy you out and eradicate your presence from their neighbourhoods, their towns and cities and their countries
the politicians, you can have them, use them as you like, they will better serve the purpose they have set out to serve from the beginning

but the state is of the people, and only of the people and they will organize the way the people want ..

.. to the point that no-one will be without a job

.. the state will be ..of the people


the state will not issue currency .. will not interfere with the running of corporations .. corporations will not be taxed .. they can keep their profits .. the state will make certain that all individuals are cared for .. and all what an individual needs will be provided for .. individuals will know that they would have shelter and food and that they will not suffer whatever the circumstances ... the projects undertaken by the state will be done under the basis that the state will not be dealing with money .. money ceases to be .. as long as the affairs of the state .. are concerned .. states will not issue budgets .. will not pay salaries .. will not pay pensions .. states will not be dealing with money ..

as the list is inexhaustible .. it is not appropriate to take each task separately .. but using the basic principle .. that all individuals within the jurisdiction of the state .. will be provided for .. the details of each task can be elaborated upon that principle ..

corporations will not be curtailed .. they are free .. and to be emphasized totally free .. to do what they want .. provided that they do not harm the citizens of the state .. as the state .. primarily and foremost becomes .. the state of citizens and not the state of corporations

as the state does not have anything to do with money .. it is therefore evident that the role of the banks .. becomes obsolete .. for the sake of the state .. practically inactivated .. banks if they continue to operate .. it would only be for the sake of the corporations .. they are free to devise their own rules .. in whatever way they want .. they can even issue their own private currency .. call them .. bankos ..

their function is irrelevant for the purposes of the state and of the people .. they can do what they like .. for any people working in the banks .. they do so on their accord .. and any conditions of work .. remuneration is going to be negotiated with the owners .. without the state involved .. interfering .. or caring for it .. apart from the point of the employees .. suffering by the acts of the employers .. as employees are citizens of the state and can not be harassed in any way ..

the state will be left to its sole role .. taking care of the citizens . with the citizens .. by the citizens

Americans strategic foreclosures, deliberate acts. Wall Street banks will go bust(. or ?)

Every people in every country have their own way, to deal a blow to capitalism. Corporations, banks shenanigans will not go un-punished. The whole scenario of strategic foreclosures proves that everybody gets its comeuppance.

In 'I won't pay' movement spreads across Greece, the following comment was made ..

"taciturn-2970886
The movement will get here..It's already begun with strategic defaults on mortgages,
As our citizens become more informed on the corrupt, egregious conduct by our banks, brokers, and Goldman Sachs in particular, our citizenry will seriously revolt.
The capitalist scammers will get their just dessert from us hard working patriotic Americans..The scammers will be bashed..Wall Street has destroyed America.
The day will come when the miscreants in high finance will be hung out to dry.
9 votes
Reply#10 - Tue Feb 22, 2011 7:09 PM EST"

Expressed as a movement, that has already begun in USA. Strategic defaults as this article "Are Strategic Defaults Immoral? " informs.

"Strategic mortgage default is in the real estate news these days. Since many homes have lost a lot of market value since they were purchased and the amount owed on the property is much more than the home would currently sell for, some people are deliberately letting the home go into foreclosure so the homeowner can get out of the debt."

Existing mortgages, exceeding current market values, that drive homeowners to stop paying the mortgages to the lending banks, leading to foreclosure of the property so the homeowner could get out of debt. And who chooses to act in such a way?

In article "An Example of Deliberate Default of a Mortgage"

"Why would a person with a good job who can afford to make his house payments just stop doing so and let the property fall into foreclosure? The answer is that in places like Phoenix, Arizona or Las Vegas, Nevada, where prices increased the most during the bubble, home values have in turn dropped by large amounts. The average in those areas is in the 50-60% range and is sometimes higher than that. So the home owner now owes substantially more on his mortgage than the property is worth."

Persons that have good jobs and can afford to make house payments but decides not to, and they have been doing it since 2009, as Wikipedia mentions.

"A study in September 2009 from the credit reporting agency Experian and consulting outfit Oliver Wyman estimated that close to a fifth of troubled mortgages in the U.S. involved borrowers who were strategically defaulting."

A fifth of troubled mortgages in September 2009, involved borrowers strategically defaulting, with the banks taking the losses

"So this begs the question about the morality of sticking someone else with one’s mortgage debt. To be honest this practice does feel a bit slimy. If their bank gets stuck and has to eat most of the loan amount and take the loss, the costs will eventually be borne by others in the community through higher prices and more difficult loan terms for other people. On top of that, the borrowers are adults. They signed a valid contract, so why should’t they pay their debts, especially if they have the money?"

Losses which the banks, as their aged-old practice is, expect to roll the costs to others in the community through higher prices, difficult loan terms. As if they can. In an already stagnant housing market, which means they will bear a devastating blow in their finances, a loss that is not recoverable.

And therefore the morality issue. Moral consequences split between the banks and prospective new mortgage borrowers who are expected to suffer from such acts of deliberate defaulting. But since, the state of the housing market is such, it is doubtful whether the banks will be able to pass the costs to new mortgage buyers, and the banks themselves would suffer the bulk of the blow out of the deliberate acts of defaulting.

Banks experiencing the other end of the stick, for the first time, and the issue of morality goes solely towards them. Would someone feel remorse about the blow they are about to suffer?

"Then again one might ask how bad do banks feel when they foreclose on a homeowner? The big Wall St. banks created dubious financial instruments with mortgages, and they approved loans for buyers who were not the least bit qualified. They did this to make quick paper profits and give themselves huge bonuses."


Morality? Such a flimsy excuse. What a laugh. Where did banks get their morals from? What kind of morals they abide to?

"Ethical issues
Some ethicists have questioned the morality of strategic default, arguing that one has a duty to make payments on debt if one is able.[4] Others argue that there is no such moral duty, a loan being a contract between consenting adults, and noting that financial investors routinely default on non-recourse loans that have negative equity.[3] Some argue further that there is a moral duty to strategically default,[4] and that one should make such decisions based on one's financial interest "unclouded by unnecessary guilt or shame", as lenders who do not modify mortgages do the same, "seek[ing] to maximize profits or minimize losses irrespective of concerns of morality or social responsibility,"[5] or more bluntly stating that "The economy is fundamentally amoral."[6] Further, obligations to honor a contract are balanced by obligations to oneself and one's family, the latter speaking in favor of strategic default, some arguing "You need to put yourself and your family's finances first,"[6] while one also has obligations to a community, which may be damaged by default.[4]"

After going to such great lengths, as to declare that one's financial decisions should be "unclouded by unnecessary guilt or shame" and by 'one' meaning any entity, that entity being either a physical person or a financial corporation, the entities entering this domain of financial activities, the lenders, the banks "seek to maximise profits or minimise losses irrespective of morality or social responsibility" .. and somebody ..or better an entity that does not have to be considerate towards the members of a society that is a part of, acting irresponsibly, is not merely amoral, but immoral.

These are the morals, banks abide to, a concoction to justify their deeds, properly termed misdeeds. And the banks do not deserve anything but, the very same immoral stick, they have been waving for time immemorial, against people.

As economy, beyond the maximising profits and minimising losses it is most and foremost and unequivocally about the lives of people.

As the obligations to oneself and one's family weigh a lot more than the obligations to honour a contract, since without individuals capable to sustain family and self they would not be a society at all. Obligations to contracts are only possible, if and only if, obligations to oneself and one's family are met, but not the other way around.

The quick paper profits, vehemently sought out by banks, the strategic foreclosures, expressed as a movement, the quick paper profits backfiring. Banks foreclosing to their heart's delight, assumed that all their paper profits would be realised in tangible solid assets but alas they created a trap in which they have fallen into, like helpless mice, the current value of the houses foreclosed do not reflect the paper values out of which their paper profits were based upon. Do not materialise.

The banks take the loss and as their current and usual practice to roll the costs to new clients with higher prices, higher prices of what? Of foreclosed houses? .. how can they? to such a slow weak market .. how can they push house values up .. who would buy them?

They will have to bear the full losses themselves, probably starting by cutting the bonuses to their CEOs, or firing a few of them. With all the repercussions in the housing market implied, as themselves certainly, as all other Americans have homes, paying mortgages which now they could no longer afford and judging by their bonuses (oh, you are transgressing .. drooling ..) their houses would be enormous .. defaulting on their loans .. the burden will passed on .. on some other banks, if not their own .. the whole affair spiraling .. out of their control.

.. banks will go bust .. new bailouts ahead?

Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, the whole world, had enough of inequality. Money, the pervasive role that creates it.

inequality .. what are the tools .. by which inequality is enforced ... established .. perpetrated .. money .. in its pervasive role .. in gearing the acts of certain individuals more than others .. undeservedly

all that has been achieved .. by any group of human individuals .. it has been made possible .. by all involved .. in projects undertaken .. it is not enough the funding .. the siphoning of money for any project to come to fruition .. it requires the dedicated efforts from hundreds of individuals .. for any society the world over ..

humanity's achievements out of the coordinated efforts of all human individuals, money system rewards certain individuals more than they deserve

but alas the spoils are divided unequally .. money .. acquires prominence beyond its comeuppance

it establishes .. a rotten system of values .. all emanating out of .. the current social structures .. based on the exploitation .. of the work of the human individual .. as for anything that humanity has achieved .. it was and it is made possible out of the coordinated .. organized efforts of all individuals involved in an activity .. but alas the money system prevailing .. distorts such reality .. and the only ones that get the spoils .. are the ones that they have put .. provided the money

entrepreneurs .. investors .. lenders ..take all the spoils .. and all other people that have contributed are treated .. a little better than slaves .. paid slaves .. the work they have offered looses its meaning .. degraded .. ridiculed .. demeaned .. and lost

and the worst ever side-effect .. the concoction out of this .. of a formula ..
.. an equation .. a function .. for the individuals in societies .. to use to explain .. describe and interpret .. and practice .. all that is happening .. around them .. based on the paradigm of money .. in all aspects of the society they live .. they are faced with ..

poisoning the human individual's life cycle .. at every level in which he acts .. family .. friends .. neighborhoods .. communities .. societies .. nations .. states .. the whole world at large ..